you ever driven one on 16's? to try it is to love it matePersonally unless your serious about Tracking your ST Etc then I really dont think It matter's.
Using It as a daily driver you wont notice ANY diffrence between the two.IMO I think 16's look toO small on a ST.
i think which looks better depends on the look of your car and personal opinion, you cant really say 17's look better full stop on a car.Each to there own I suspose....
Personally I prefer 17's (For look's) If I was going to do lot's of Track Day's and 1/4 Mile Sprint's (Motorsport) Then yes I would use 16's.
3-4MPH Is nothing and pointless If the car Is a daily driver and spend's most of It's time round town though as you can only go 30MPH
im also refering to our ST's mate. if you compare the std height ST to the std height ZS the ZS looks the better proportioned to me.Dave - Im just talking about our ST's,Other car's really suit 16's Etc (Depending what size you can fit on) Not all car's will except 17's.
I have seen a few ST's on 16's and they did look good.I.E Euro,Small Wheel's and Slammed
Your car is the reason for me getting 16'sHave you driven or been in a car with 16s Chris?
I changed down a size when I got my new wheels, the difference was really something, ride quality improved massively (I now run 205/45 R16, the same as the European spec ST as standard, also the same size as the Clio 182/182 Trophy), overall the grip didn't seem any lower but the car was much more progressive at the limit and much more comfortable even when lowered as much as it is on H&R coilovers - ask pop80_uk, he's been in my car, first thing he commented on was the ride!