Joined
·
363 Posts
Here is how it sits, if I was being picky I’d like the rear to be slightly higher. Ground clearance and arch gap to change when 205/45/16 tyres go on. Sat a bit too low for me
Ah yes I thought it might looking at the pics. I’ve actually found a 2nd hand miltek system (manifold and cat) that works out a lot cheaper, so I’ve decided to go down that route and get a custom link piece to link with Mountune cat back, saved £500-600 doing it this way.RE the exhaust situation. If you want as close to a mountune system as possible... Go with a mongoose. Same manifold style with a sport cat/decat to suit, and it also mounts up to the mountune catback. Mountune and mongoose both being 2.25". With all the bends in all the right places.
I currently have a mongoose decat on mine mounted between a miltek manifold and mountune catback.
As there are 2 variations of sports cat/decat from mongoose. One with the flexi piece and one without.
Causing the low ride height on the Eibachs? They looked ok, poly would increase the ride height (stiffer), so I could go that route? But I don’t want excessive feedback into the chassisYou sure it’s not the spring isolators ? Mine were shot when I swapped mine out, changed them for poly versions.
If you fail an mot for having eibach lowering springs, then really that's a sign to never take any car to that particular garage in future, as they'd have to be pretty retarded to do so.So I didn’t like the way the car sat, on the Eibach at the rear, about 10mm too low, and lower than the front. I thought I could fit the height adjustment from the GAZ kit to the Eibach springs but the lower section of the spring is too small in diameter, so I’ve switched to the GAZ springs. Which by my calculations are a fair bit stiffer, but still one of the softest coilover springs. Ride height is now perfect but I’ve got to test the ride quality, hoping it should be pretty ok.
I noted the Eibach rear springs arent really progressive, as the wire thickness and coil swept diameter doesn’t change, so really they are inbuilt helper springs, to prevent the spring being loose during MOT / unloading the rear.
The car when jacked up does make the spring slightly loose but it still contacts the seating, so I’ll maybe get some helper springs just to be on safe side and to pass the MOT
You won’t fail on a Eibach as the spring remains seated when unloaded. The coil over springs can become loose when fully unloaded hence the helper spring required to pass MOT.If you fail an mot for having eibach lowering springs, then really that's a sign to never take any car to that particular garage in future, as they'd have to be pretty retarded to do so.
I wouldn't try and reinvent the wheel.
I've never had a car that was jacked off of anywhere but the rear beam during an mot.You won’t fail on a Eibach as the spring remains seated when unloaded. The coil over springs can become loose when fully unloaded hence the helper spring required to pass MOT.
Im with you, no sorry you are right the MOT test wouldn’t jack the car. I actually copied that info from someone else (bad internet) . But I’m still considering a helper spring, just for own piece of mind, if I ever unloaded the rear (hump back bridge)I've never had a car that was jacked off of anywhere but the rear beam during an mot.
As that's the only structural jacking point for a pit jack that spans the entire pit width.
I passed 6 mots on H&R's which would fall out when shock is at full extension.
It might be worth asking why your tester is carrying out inspections beyond the standard test.
Totally agree about the concern, I felt the same. Until my daily route changed and saw me gapping a level crossing daily.Im with you, no sorry you are right the MOT test wouldn’t jack the car. I actually copied that info from someone else (bad internet) . But I’m still considering a helper spring, just for own piece of mind, if I ever unloaded the rear (hump back bridge)